DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORGS
701 8, COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490
TUR ‘
Docket No: 1835-14
11 March 2015
thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations,
and policies,
You enlisted in the Navy and began a period of active duty on 8
December 2000. You served without disciplinary incident until 2
August 2006, when you received nonjudicial punishment (NJP) for
being drunk on duty. On 4 August 2006, upon arrival at your
first day of alcohol rehabilitation, you were dis-enrolled from
Subsequently, after waiving your procedural Yights, your
commanding officer recommended Separation by reason of misconduct
due to commission of a serious offense. on 31 October 2006, you
noted that you had wrongfully use a controlled substance and
consumed alcoholic ‘beverages during work hours, and as such, you
were not recommended for retention or reenlistment. The
discharge authority approved this recommendation and directed
separation under honorable conditions with the assignment of an
RE-4 reenlistment code, and on 6 November 2006, you were so
discharged. |
The Board, in its review of your entire record and application, .
carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as
your desire to upgrade your discharge and change your narrative
reason for separation and reenlistment code so that you may join
the Naval Reserve. Nevertheless, the Board concluded these
factors were not sufficient to warrant relief in your case
because of the seriousness of your alcohol related misconduct,
nonrecommendation for retention or reenlistment, and failure to
successfully complete a rehabilitation program. Accordingly, |
your application has been denied.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board
within one year from the date of the Board's decision. In this |
regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of
regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently, when
applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden
is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable
material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
ROBERT J. O’ NEILL
Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 00546-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 September 2010. However, the SARP at Corpus Christi Hospital and your command Drug and Alcohol Program Assistant (DAPA) Ggtermined that you were an alcohol rehabilitation failure and it was recommended that you be separated for not complying with the Peonmended treatment. On 27 February 2008, your case was heard by an administrative discharge board (ADB), which...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 04516-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 February 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Given your misconduct, alcohol rehabilitation failure, and the fact that the separation authorities were ordered to issue you an RE-4...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 06714-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 5 March 2002 at age 23. In this regard, an RE-4 reenlistment code is...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 04802-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You reenlisted in the Navy on 31 October 1980 at age 21 after a prior period of honorable service. On...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 07494-08
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. In March 2005 your commanding officer recommended you be processed for an administrative separation by reason of alcohol rehabilitation failure as evidenced by your two civil convictions for driving under the influence of alcohol while enrolled ina Level III rehabilitation aftercare...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 09377-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 August 2009. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board, Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 08000-08
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all Material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 22 November 2005 an ADB recommended discharge under honorable conditions by reason of convenience of the government due to alcohol rehabilitation failure. On 2 February 2006 you were so discharged and assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 02782-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You reenlisted in the Navy on 1 April 1987 after three years of prior honorable service. You were...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0729 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 July 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. You must first apply to the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB).
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 12735-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 August 2010. You were recommended for separation with an honorable discharge due to alcohol rehabilitation failure (having three alcohol-related incidents within your naval career). Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.